User talk:Steven Tuyishime

Welcome to Proteopedia! We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to read the help pages. Again, welcome and have fun! Eran Hodis 23:44, 14 October 2008 (IST)

Ezekwe/Lakkur/Tuyishime
Dear Steven,

You created a page called Ezekwe/Lakkur/Tuyishime to add scenes for your class project. Proteopedia pages are created only on a particular protein or subject. Please create your project where your instructor has instructed you to create it -- I'm assuming your userpage "User:Steven_Tuyishime".

Please erase all content from Ezekwe/Lakkur/Tuyishime and move it to your user page. I will then delete the page Ezekwe/Lakkur/Tuyishime.

Best, Eran Hodis 15:15, 17 November 2008 (IST)

Thanks Steven, I've deleted the page Ezekewe/Lakkur/Tuyishime. Let me know if you have any questions in the future.

Best, Eran Hodis 18:28, 17 November 2008 (IST)

Outline Assessment
The outline is in pretty good shape. You provide a nice discussion of the term used in CATH which I thought to be appropriate for the assignment. The WIKIS subject matter also match the text. Overall, the text is well written. In your final submission, remove the links from the first assignment, and label your references--see Proteopedia help on references or view my page. Looking forward to seeing the finished product.

Grade 8.5/9.0 Dr. Gluick

Comments on Revision
A couple of things: Dropping the T and H of CATH is fine. However, you can illustrate topology ( which is just how things are linked) by using N-C coloring scheme; Or you might want to illustrate the fold by a better color scheme than just boring gray. Also, if you can center on the final selection, than rotate about the selection instead of the entire molecule. I do not think showing the amino acid residue that connects the two domains is instructive. Tom Gluick 08:20, 18 December 2008 (IST)

more comments
hi

Each of these is a way to classify molecules.--this sentence needs work--is not CATH a hierarchical system used to classify molecules? The figures do not help to show your points effectively. the last wiki is not really necesssary? Tom Gluick 18:58, 19 December 2008 (IST)

How to make it better!
Your email: > Hey Dr. Gluick I changed the wording and also took out the last wiki. I just had a question on what you meant by the statement : "The figures do not help to show your points effectively." I have been thinking about how to manipulate the wikis to better represent the text but all I have been able to come up with is what I have on the page. I was just wondering what kind of wiki would show my points better. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

My Reply:

1. label the residues that start and end the domain 2. Since time is short this is what I would do:
 * a. First WIKI shows all subunits with 11 transaparent and one with the two domains--colored differently
 * b. Second WIKI focuses on one of the domains specifically, this WIKI would have the subunit in the center of the field, spinning and as large as possible with the N and C termini of the domain clearly labeled. Also show the features that make the sandwhich a sandwhich with effective color scheme and bring this out in your text or send the reader to CATH site for this domain directly.
 * c. Another WIKI shows the features of the domain with some indication of what the label means --more here after review--
 * d. I would repeat this for the other domain.
 * e. I would link to CATH directly so the reader can see typical structures or explanation of the fold in the CATH database.

3. Again this is what I would do.

Dr Gluick Tom Gluick 23:49, 19 December 2008 (IST)

The Finale
Hi

A great job-- It is almost ready for prime time. With a few edits you ought to enter the contest. The second link to CATH does not work. Also number the termini in the domains. The explanation is good. You ought to zoom in and may be use different set of colors for showing the sandwich.

Grade: 10/10

Dr. Gluick Tom Gluick 04:45, 21 December 2008 (IST)